Cases 11 - 20 of 9,606
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CO 2 BANGER, CO 1 CALLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Mikeska et al
as 3:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stone
Defendant:
Anton Mikeska and Tow Pro Wreckage Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Steel Corporation v. Summit Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
United States Steel Corporation
Defendant:
Summit Inc, Stone Transport LP, Load n Go Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Adams v. Holler Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sherry Adams
Defendant:
Holler Law Firm, Najarian Capital, LLC, Scott K. Camp and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
