Cases 1 - 10 of 1,765
Fermo v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, Kiran Ahuja and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Jacob Fermo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tetmeyer v. City of Indianapolis et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petteway v. Parsons et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Parsons, Yasdel Moya, Landolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 4:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Bodhi
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Strange
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. EVRARD-STRANG CONSTRUCTION., INC.
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS,
Defendant:
EVRARD-STRANG CONSTRUCTION., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Hunter v. Maneses et al
as 3:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
Darrick L Hunter
Defendant:
Jilma Maneses, David Flynn, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Bodhi
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.J.E. v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05261
Plaintiff:
S.J.E.
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Cheryl Strange, Rob Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
