Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Gable v. Ackom et al
as 6:2024cv01131
Defendant:
Karl Nelson, William Pierce, Emil Brandaw and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West Technology Group, LLC et al v. Sundstrom
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
West Technology Group, LLC and CX360, Inc.
Defendant:
Karl Sundstrom
SUNDSTROM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
ERIN MICHAEL SUNDSTROM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SUNDSTROM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
LAMONT SUNDSTROM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flores v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Flores
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Collette Peters, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derkach v. Maney et al
as 2:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Vitaliy Derkach
Defendant:
Patrick H. Maney, Garth Gulick, Sims Beata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbess v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Forbess
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Garth Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lima-Flores v. Underhill et al
as 2:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Santos A. Lima-Flores
Defendant:
Mr. Underhill, Mr. E. Shaw, Dorothy Wettlaufer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slight v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Sue Washburn, C. Kairos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Slight, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
