Cases 41 - 50 of 503
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2006
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., VALUE DRUG COMPANY, KROGER COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2007
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE, ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEB GROCERY CO. LP, RITE AID HEADQUARTERS CORPORATION, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1521
Defendant / Appellant:
RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Brooks v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 4:2019cv00725
Defendant:
SuperValu Inc., The Kroger Co., Southstar, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-580
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cohen Rese Gallery, Inc., Lopez-Dejonge, Inc., Jasa, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others
Intervenor:
Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Gander Mountain Company, Holiday Companies and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc, and American Express Company
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
In re: Processed Egg Products
as 20-1045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUPERVALU INC, HY VEE INC, GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO INC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROSE ACRE FARMS INC, UNITED STATES EGG MARKETERS INC and UNITED EGG PRODUCERS
In re: Processed Egg Products
as 20-1127
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WALGREEN CO, WINN DIXIE STORES, HE BUTT GROCERY CO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES EGG MARKETERS INC and UNITED EGG PRODUCERS
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSE ACRE FARMS INC
Mitchell v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp. et al
as 8:2019cv03311
Defendant:
SuperValu Inc., United Natural Foods, Inc. and Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp.
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Northwest Administrators Inc v. SuperValu Inc
as 2:2019cv01834
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
SuperValu Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
