Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McQueen v. Justice Department et al
as 5:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Justice Department, United States District Courts, Supreme Courts of United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Simon v. DOJ, et al
as 23-1689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOE DEPUTY CLERKS OF SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES, ELIZABETH B. PRELOGAR and others
Simon, Charles v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Doe Deputy Clerks of Supreme Court of United States, Elizabeth B. Prelogar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hicks v. 6th District Supreme Court of United States Memphis, TN
as 2:2022cv02693
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hicks
Respondent:
6th District Supreme Court of United States Memphis, TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLEN v. FRIMPONG et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
SUSAN FRIMPONG, SCOTT S. HARRIS and SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yi v. Supreme Court of United States of America et al
as 8:2015cv03731
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Supreme Court of United States of America, John Roberts, Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yi v. Supreme Court of United States of America et al
as 8:2015cv03663
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Supreme Court of United States of America, John Roberts, Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Garner v. The Supreme Court of US
as 12-6890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE GARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF BOSTON MA and others
Defendant:
AFFILIATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
