Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Susan Baker et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 3:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Suite B LLC, DSM P GP LLC, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Kless, Carolyn Noyes, Dorothy D. Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Susan Baker et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 2:2020cv04335
Plaintiff:
Leonard A. Semas, Jim Kless, Ed Quintal and others
Defendant:
Does 1-100, inclusive, DSM P GP LLC, Janet Chubb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv02178
Defendant:
Commissoner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Susan Baker
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kilpatrick v. Baker
as 18-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory D. Kilpatrick
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Baker, Investigator - D.E.A.
Kilpatrick v. Baker
as 1:2018cv01416
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Susan Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Guitron Alcazar III, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2017cv01054
Defendant:
Guitron Alcazar III, Inc., Amparo Alcazar, Hector Alcazar and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sheila Bell v. County of Galveston, et al
as 15-41257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHEILA RENEE BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF GALVESTON, DWIGHT D. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF STATE (TEXAS) and others
Bell v. County Of Galveston et al
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Sheila Renee Bell
Defendant:
County Of Galveston, Dwight D Sullivan, Secretary of State (Texas) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv02976
Plaintiff:
Susan Baker and Johnie Baker
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01916
Plaintiff:
Eldon Shane Baker and Susan Baker
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
