Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Morris Weatherspoon v. Susan George, et al
as 17-1371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN GEORGE, Psychiatrist, JON PAVITT, Dental Hygienist, GAIL WANG, Dentist and others
Anthony Threatt v. Michelle Williams-Ward, et al
as 16-2334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE WILLIAMS-WARD, ARUS, WAFAA HANNA, Nurse, ROBERT ARTMAN, Officer and others
Defendant:
TUMADA, et al.
Morris Weatherspoon v. Susan George, et al
as 15-2304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN GEORGE, Psychiatrist, Macomb Correctional Facility, JON PAVITT, Dental Hygienist, Macomb Correctional Facility, GAIL WANG, Dentist, Macomb Correctional Facility and others
George v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12498
Plaintiff:
Brenda Susan George
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GEORGE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as NJ/3:15-cv-05722
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SUSAN GEORGE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , ETHICON, INC and ETHICON, LLC
GEORGE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv05722
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SUSAN GEORGE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC and ETHICON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv40111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Abraria v. George et al
as 2:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ralph Abraria
Defendant:
Susan George, Amy Fernandez and Siskiyou County Probation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell Latona v. Prison Health Ser Inc, et al
as 10-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL ALAN LATONA
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SER INC, RENEE WNEK and SUSAN GEORGE
Russell Latona v. Prison Health Ser
as 09-1527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL ALAN LATONA
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SER INC, BAIRD, RENEE WNEK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
