Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SWEAT v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 3:2026cv12148
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SWEAT
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
McCullough v. Craven County Detention Center et al
as 5:2026ct03243
Plaintiff:
Brittany McCullough and Brittany Latrina McCullough
Defendant:
Craven County Detention Center, Pamlico County Detention Center, Sheriff Chris Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. State of Utah, et al
as 26-4071
Plaintiff:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant:
THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, DUCHESNE CITY, a municipal corporation and others
SWEAT v. MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION et al
as 5:2026cv00153
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JONATHAN SWEAT
Defendant:
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION, CONTRACTED OPERATORS FOR MEDICAL, VELEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caitlin Darr v. Sweat Equity Group LLC
as 8:2026cv01390
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Darr
Defendant:
Sweat Equity Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. State of Utah, et al
as 26-601
Petitioner:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Respondent:
THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, DUCHESNE CITY, a municipal corporation and others
Heather Good v. Police et al
as 3:2026cv00319
Plaintiff:
Heather Good
Defendant:
Police and Single Sweats Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
