Cases 1 - 10 of 10,086
Brown v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Lekisha Dee Brown
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Gary McFadden, Reserve Health PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brady v. Truist Bank
as 4:2024cv03033
Defendant:
Truist Bank and BB&T Bank
Plaintiff:
James Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hadley v. Vida et al
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Matthew B Hadley
Defendant:
Larry N. Vida, Lil B Trucking and B&T Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
WILSON v. DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
SUSAN WILSON
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVIDSON COUNTY, RICHIE T. SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv02907
Petitioner:
T Terell Bryan
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Michael Parker v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. PARKER and PATRICE PARKER
Intervenor:
ALICE MEJIA
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Limited Partnership and NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Gallimore v. Rose
as 7:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Emily Smith Gallimore
Defendant:
Dylan T. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
