Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03267
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02450
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Herring v. Groom, et al.
as 3:2026cv00732
Plaintiff:
Daniel Luke Herring
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Groom, Dr. Unknown Robinson, Doe Nurse 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. McDonald
as 6:2026cv03072
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Yan v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv07754
Plaintiff:
Weiqing Yan
Defendant:
Equaan D. Smith, Russell A. Robinson and Ruslan Vdovicenco
Cross-Complainant:
Ruslan Vdovicenco
Cross-Defendant:
Russell A. Robinson
Counter-Claimant:
Ruslan Vdovicenco
Counter-Defendant:
Weiqing Yan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Buccola v. Bradford et al
as 5:2026cv07752
Plaintiff:
Theresa Irene Buccola
Defendant:
Matt Bradford, Cristian Pantoja, Josaias Adan Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
