Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Daniels v. State of Florida
as 0:2026cv62068
Plaintiff: Roy O. Daniels
Defendant: State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - GUILFORD COUNTY
as 1:2026cv00736
Plaintiff: ROY CARNELL BROWN, II
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamond Thomas v. Milan Berry, et al
as 26-2500
Plaintiff: Tamond E. Thomas
Defendant: Milan Berry, Roy Peters, Judge James Beck, Pike County and others
Wragth v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 3:2026cv02471
Plaintiff: Roy Wragth
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09434
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02013
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05773
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv02624
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?