Cases 11 - 20 of 342
THOMAS v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00786
Petitioner:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. DIAL
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Defendant:
SARGEANT DIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOR T. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK KNUTSON, DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden and others
THOMAS v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS AT SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS AT SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nancy Cheairs v. Mark Thomas, et al
as 23-5496
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NANCY CHEAIRS
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MEMPHIS PROFESSIONAL IMAGING, INC., HELEN THOMAS and others
HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv02649
Plaintiff:
HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, Aacting commissioner TROY A MILLER, PORT DIRECTOR TENEVAL T THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305 Custom Duties:0Forfeiture-Immoral Articles
Thomas v. Powell et al
as 4:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Andre T Thomas and Andre T. Thomas
Defendant:
Eugene D Powell, James E Wiley, Eugene D. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
THOMAS v. JOHN DOE 1-4
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Dalveccio T. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. John Doe 1-4
as 5:2023ct03141
Plaintiff:
Dalveccio T. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mehaffy v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Ryan Daniel Mehaffy
Respondent:
Warden T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
