Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Paul T. Logan, Jr. v. BMW of North America LLC
as 2:2019cv07620
Plaintiff:
Paul T Logan and Paul T. Logan, Jr.
Defendant:
BMW of North America LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02836
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-30624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alfred et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 3:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Melvin Alfred , Charles E. Allgood , Wanda J. Allgood and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 9:2015cv01326
Plaintiff:
Melvin Mitchell
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, B. McAuliffe, R. Brabant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03592
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Logan v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv00869
Petitioner:
Loyd T Logan, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
