Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Carl Norton v. Wilkins & Co. Realty, Inc.
as 22-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL T. NORTON and NORHURST PROPERTIES DANVILLE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
WILKINS & CO. REALTY, INC., JAMES BUCKNER, EDWARD B. WALKER and others
Norton et al v. Wilkins & Co. Realty, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Norton and Norhurst Properties Danville, LLC
Defendant:
Wilkins & Co. Realty, Inc., Wilkins & Company, Inc., James Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scavelli v. Mercer et al
as 2:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Justin Mercer, Katheryne Gonzalez, Cody T Norton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scavelli, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv05320
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc
Plaintiff:
Norton, John, Individually, and as Executor of the Estate of Christine T. Norton (Deceased) and John Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hammond v. Norton et al
as 2:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Andre Hammond
Defendant:
T. Norton, Shropshere and Dr. Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Norton et al
as 3:2017cv02547
Plaintiff:
Jamal Roosevelt Roberts
Defendant:
T. Norton and J. McKean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cohea v. Melo
as 1:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M Melo, Thelton E Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohea v. Melo
as 4:2014cv04288
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M. Melo, Thelton E. Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Todd v. P. Johnson, et al
as 14-15617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
P. JOHNSON, T. NORTON, HARRINGTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
