Cases 11 - 20 of 40,820
Taylor v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65401
Plaintiff:
Maghan Taylor
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lombardi v. Prosecution and Code Enforcement Office, et al
as 24-1183
Plaintiff:
KIKI LOMBARDI, AKA K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard
Defendant:
PROSECUTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE, West Colfax, DENVER PROBATION AND CASES, Case Level at Probation, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Roman Monzon v. Sherrie Hatch
as 24-6412
Plaintiff:
ROMAN SEBASTIAN MONZON
Defendant:
SHERRIE HATCH, KAY GARVEY, CARRIE TAYLOR and others
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2798
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL REESE, CPT. ERIC P. SMITH and others
Music Sales Corp. et al v. Taylor AC, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv10538
Plaintiff:
Music Sales Corp., W Chappell Music Corp. Doing business as WC Music Corp. and Lisabella Music
Defendant:
Taylor AC, Inc., Marie Armelagos and James Armelagos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Taylor v. TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Mikey Ray Taylor, Jr. and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lavale Burns v. UP Fintech Holding Limited et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lavale Burns
Petitioner:
Ang Xiangwei Darren, Ryann Jiin Yuan Lai, Christopher L. Dudleck and others
Defendant:
UP Fintech Holding Limited, Tianhua Wu and John Fei Zeng
Brian Taylor v. CDS Advantage Solutions, et al
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CDS ADVANTAGE SOLUTIONS and MARC SULLIVAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
