Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 12,025
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Plaintiff: Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant: Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Steven Fleshman, Sergeant Nicholas Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 4:2024cv05039
Plaintiff: Bodhi
Defendant: Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New Muslim Party et al v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2024cv00895
Plaintiff: New Muslim Party and Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant: State of Florida and City of Miami
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. CNN et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: CNN and Fox News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Corrections Enterprise
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: Oregon Corrections Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. E.O.C.I. et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: E.O.C.I. and Chaplain Zuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Fagan et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Plaintiff: Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant: Shemia Fagan and Lavonne Griffin-Valade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff: ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Taylor v. Coates
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff: Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party
Defendant: Ta-Nehisi Coates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant: Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?