Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv05863
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT, CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4685 IN THE NAME OF SMART LEARNING, INC., CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0711 IN THE NAME OF HEE AH NAM and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Contents of TD Bank Account Ending 7684 held in the name of O'Shane K. Malcolm et al
as 3:2023cv01478
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Contents of TD Bank Account Ending 7684 held in the name of O'Shane K. Malcolm and Contents of TD Bank Account Ending 1350 held in the name of Michael Harrison
Claimant: O'Shane K. Malcolm and Michael Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $126,569.97 Seized from TD Bank Account Number ******4878, Held in the Name of Akusan Ventures, LLC
as 0:2023cv01734
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $126,569.97 Seized from TD Bank Account Number ******4878, Held in the Name of Akusan Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. $179,685.00 seized from TD Bank Convenience Checking Account ending in 9459
as 1:2023cv00935
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $179,685.00 seized from TD Bank Convenience Checking Account ending in 9459
Claimant: Shiliang Liang
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Ford Raptor 2017 VIN: 1FTFW1RG5HFC59994
as 2:2023cv00441
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2017 Ford Raptor VIN: 1FTFW1RG5HFC59994 and Ford Raptor 2017 VIN: 1FTFW1RG5HFC59994
Claimant: TD Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $668.02 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Citibank, N.A., Account 4897896885, held in the name of Chad Laforest, and all funds traceable thereto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv09324
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $668.02 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Citibank, N.A., Account 4897896885, held in the name of Chad Laforest, and all funds traceable thereto, $4,741.82 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Citibank, N.A., Account ending 6893, held in the name of Chad Laforest, and all funds traceable thereto, $555.07 in United States currency formerly on deposit in TD Bank Account 4345668101, held in the name of Chad Laforest and all funds traceable thereto and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. $136,252.26 seized et al
as 3:2021cv01264
Defendant: $136,252.26 SEIZED FROM TD BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 3953,, $75,557.38 SEIZED FROM TD BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 2335, $136,252.26 Seized and others
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $5,230,918.26 in United States Currency Seized From TD Bank Account #432-9634011, et al.
as 2:2021cv01755
Defendant: $5,230,918.26 in United States Currency Seized From TD Bank Account #432-9634011, et al., $294,971.33 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT # 3250 9092 0626, MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES SEIZED FROM BILL OMAR CARRASQUILLO and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: JESSE GONZALEZ and JENNIFER GONZALES
Petitioner: Bill Omar Carrasquillo
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02181
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $100,751.58 seized from TD Bank account 1167 and $57,877.08 seized from TD Bank account 0015
as 4:2020cv00564
Defendant: $100,751.58 seized from TD Bank account 1167 and $57,877.08 seized from TD Bank account 0015
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?