Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 89
DOE et al v. LADAPO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff: JANE DOE, SUSAN DOE, Brenda Boe and others
Defendant: Joseph A. Ladapo, FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Scot Ackerman and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ACADEMIC PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATION, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Subpoenas Served On:
as 23-7025
In Re: In re: Subpoenas Served On:
Petitioner / Appellant: American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrine Society, World Professional Association for Transgender Health and others
Respondent / Appellee: Jason Weida
Ohan v. American Medical Association et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff: Festus O. Ohan
Defendant: American Medical Association, National Board of Medical Examiners, Federation of State Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In Re: SUBPOENAS SERVED ON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023mc00004
In Re: SUBPOENAS SERVED ON:
Petitioner: AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, WORLD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR TRANSGENDER HEALTH and others
Respondent: JASON WEIDA
DEKKER et al v. MARSTILLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00325
Plaintiff: AUGUST DEKKER, BRIT ROTHSTEIN, SUSAN DOE and others
Defendant: FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION and SIMONE MARSTILLER
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ACADEMIC PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
The United States v. State of Idaho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff: The United States and United States of America
Defendant: State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant: Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae: New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01680
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boe et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner: Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruilova et al v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff: Kaity Ruilova and Eileen Brannigan
Defendant: Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., Board of Directors of Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., Investment Oversight Committee of the Yale-New Haven Hospital and Tax Exempt Affiliates Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Hospital Association and Association of American Medical Colleges
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Clark et al v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv10068
Plaintiff: Trudy Clark, Donna Nesmith, Jessica Smith and others
Defendant: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, The Board of Directors of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, The Pension Committee of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States, American Hospital Association and Association of American Medical Colleges
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?