Cases 11 - 20 of 979
Saddam Samaan Daoud Samaan v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Saddam Samaan Daoud Samaan
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Immigration Customs Enforcement, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Christine Topping and FNU Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Geo Group INC
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Geo Group INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Iheanwichukwu Esochaghi, D.O., Jacqueline Brown, D.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jared M Trotter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater v. Topping, et al
as 23-6217
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM LA'MONZE PLATER
Defendant:
CHRISTINE TOPPING, (FNU) ROWLEY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Hatcher v. Lovejoy Correctional Facility
as 2:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Dewayne Hatcher
Defendant:
Lovejoy Correctional Facility, Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility and Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poindexter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jim Poindexter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Timms FNU and Nurse Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. CYBORSKI et al
as 1:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
ARTHULA MILLER
Defendant:
D. CYBORSKI and GEO GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
