Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rapid Bath Remodel et al v. HomeRenew Group Holdings, L.P. et al
as 8:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bacon and Rapid Bath Remodel
Defendant:
HomeRenew Group Holdings, L.P. and Dreamstyle Remodeling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
BACON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15133
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BACON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BACON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv01116
Respondent:
GOVERNOR PHILLIP D. MURPHY, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, RANDALL K. MCCUTCHEON and others
Petitioner:
THOMAS BACON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bacon et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv10237
Plaintiff:
Kathleen L. Bacon and Thomas Bacon
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMCO Insurance Company v. Bacon, et al
as 2:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
AMCO Insurance Company
Defendant:
Thomas Bacon and Michele Paunessa-Bacon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Bacon v. County of Lake et al
as 3:2015cv04759
Plaintiff:
Dylan Thomas Bacon
Defendant:
County of Lake, Lake County Sheriff's Office and Arron Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. The City of New York
as 12-4423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Courtney Lee Adams, Thomas Adamson, Chris Agnese and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The City of New York, James Essig, Joseph Lamendola and others
Bacon v. USF Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv03218
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Bacon, IV
Defendant:
USF Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BACON v. BALICKI et al
as 2:2008cv05322
Petitioner:
THOMAS BACON
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BACON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2008cv02747
Petitioner:
THOMAS BACON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
