Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Woods v. Algoa Correctional Center et al
as 2:2026cv04214
Plaintiff:
Thomas Woods
Defendant:
Algoa Correctional Center and Janet Wankum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Falkenrath
as 2:2026cv04215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Woods
Defendant:
Jeff Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc., et al.
as 4:2026cv00335
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood
Defendant:
Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thomas Wood v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv00402
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, XILIANG, xianyujiushangmao and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Thomas Wood v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv15566
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Alvarez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11931
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rene Alvarez, David Barreto, Denise Beavers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas Wood v. Eiazuiks, et al
as 25-2340
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD
Defendant:
EIAZUIKS, KTHOFCY, XIANYOU DIECHONG TRADING CO LTD and others
WOOD v. EIAZUIKS et al
as 2:2025cv00800
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD
Defendant:
EIAZUIKS, DPAINT-US, KTHOFCY and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00116
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Thomas Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
