Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Clardy v. Hascall et al
as 2:2015cv02098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Cathy Bryant-Kaae, Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Guy et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Buckner, Bivens and Travis Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Laird et al
as 1:2014cv08544
Defendant:
Paul D. Laird, Leanne LaRina, F. Timothy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDERS v. COPE et al
as 2:2014mc00003
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, BUREAU OF PRISONS EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DEAN LANDERS
Carrington v. Coleman et al
as 5:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Carrington
Defendant:
Timothy Coleman, Ryan Luza and San Antonio Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Dane County Sheriffs
as 3:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Dane County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Dane County Sheriff et al
as 3:2013cv00565
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Dane County Sheriff, Foltman, Tillsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Timothy v. Herman, Robert, et al
as 3:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe Deputies #1-3 and Robert Herman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LEWIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02547
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. LEWIS , JAMES A. LEWIS, II , MARQUIS J. LEWIS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JONATHAN JOSEY, PAUL GROVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
