Cases 31 - 40 of 844
US v. Tito Knox
as 23-4498
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Andrada et al v. Unites States of America et al
as 3:2023cv03888
Plaintiff:
AMELITA ANDRADA, JOY ANDRADA, MELISSA ANDRADA and others
Defendant:
Unites States of America, United States Department of Agriculture and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Knox v. Herlong, Jr. et al
as 0:2023cv03697
Plaintiff:
Tito Lemont Knox, Geraldine Knox and Nicklos J Watts
Defendant:
Henry Herlong, Jr., Donald C. Coggins, Jr., Greenville County Police Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
US v. Chevres-Motta
as 23-1601
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL CHEVRES-MOTTA, a/k/a Tito Pastor, a/k/a Penco, a/k/a Gavilan
Hodge v. Livingston Police Department et al
as 9:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael Bee Hodge
Respondent:
Livingston Police Department, Matt Parrish, Chris Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hashakimana v. Hexel
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Tito Hashakimana
Defendant:
Hexel and Hexcel
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hodge v. Livingston Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv02402
Plaintiff:
Michael Bee Hodge
Defendant:
Livingston Police Department, Matt Parrish, Chris Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Krueger
as 0:2023cv02811
Petitioner:
Tito L Knox
Respondent:
Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Ramirez
as 23-10605
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alcario Ramirez, also known as "Tito"
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
