Cases 31 - 40 of 4,372
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Janice Grenadier
as 24-7037
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option OneMortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2
Defendant:
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burch et al v. Campbell County Hospital District et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Defendant:
Campbell County Hospital District Chief Executive Officer, Campbell County Hospital District Chief Operations Officer, Gabriella Nisselius and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Burch, Candace Burch (Rep) and Candace Burch (Admin)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Enomen Okogun v. Luke Miller, et al
as 24-1511
Plaintiff:
ENOMEN JOHN OKOGUN
Defendant:
LUKE MILLER, DAVID TRICOCHE, ALI ALI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-60124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
