Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Walker v. Doe
as 1:2025cv01163
Plaintiff:
Tyler Walker
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Tyler Walker, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Loveall v. Walker et al
as 5:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
Matthew Loveall
Defendant:
Tyler Walker, Brady Slimmer and Justin D'Elia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Tyler Walker
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. World Wide Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
World Wide Holdings LLC, Catching Flights Bar and Grille LLC doing business as Catching Flights Bar and Grille, Lauren Merrett and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Allen v. Page, et al.
as 1:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Officer Galegar, Cade Hammer, Rizzo Seelys and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24590
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joel Snider v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-3942
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG SHAFFER, JENNIFER HERROLD, KAREN KASKIE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL SNIDER
Walker v. USA
as 5:2019cv00211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Justin Tyler Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joel Snider v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-1626
Defendant:
TORRENCE STATE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, COLLINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG SHAFFER, KAREN KASKIE, COUNTY OF UNION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL SNIDER
Not Yet Classified:
VINCENT MOONEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
