Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Martinez v. Apex Prime Freightways, Inc., et al.
as 5:2026cv04485
Plaintiff:
Fidencia Nohemi Martinez
Defendant:
Apex Prime Freightways, Inc. and Tyrone Wilson Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Patty v. Bonta, et al.
as 26-1779
Plaintiff:
HERBERT T. PATTY
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, California Attorney General; in his official capacity, Judge THOMAS KUHNLE, JEFF ROSEN, in his official capacity and others
Patty v. Kuhnle et al
as 5:2025cv04392
Plaintiff:
Herbert T. Patty
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Jeff Rosen, Jay Boyarsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06295
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tyrones Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WIlson v. Collier
as 3:2022cv00262
Petitioner:
Michael Tyrone WIlson
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. White et al
as 3:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Unknown Gamble, Trinity Food Services, Bert Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. WILSON et al
as 1:2017cv01498
Plaintiff:
ARABA J. HARRIS
Defendant:
TYRONE WILSON and JOSEPH BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
United States of America v. Wilson (Walker)
as 17-1896
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyrone Wilson, AKA Biscuit, AKA Young Bricky, Joseph Garcia, AKA Jo Jo, Musa Marshall, AKA Slim and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Shondell Walker, AKA M-Dot
Wilson v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv22543
Plaintiff:
Andre Tyron Wilson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2016cv02141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Perry Tyrone Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
