Cases 51 - 60 of 70
MCKENZIE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28433
Plaintiff:
Tammie Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Page, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NELLIE JOHNS, DEBRA JENKINS, GERALDINE JENKINS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Page, et al
as 13-613
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
ILARAE J. PAGE, COLLEEN M. MORGAN, DEBRA JENKINS and others
Page et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00844
Plaintiff:
Ilarae J Page , Colleen M Morgan , Debra Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Page et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00844
Plaintiff:
Ilarae J Page , Colleen M Morgan , Debra Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Johnson v. Kazmierczak et al
as 1:2013cv00353
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. and Thomas Kazmierczak
Plaintiff:
Tammie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Willa Kennedy, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 11-2129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLA KENNEDY, MINNIE HOLLEY, PATRICIA OUSLEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF CHICAGO and TERRY G. HILLARD, Superintendent
Willa Kennedy, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 11-2041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLA KENNEDY, MINNIE HOLLEY, PATRICIA OUSLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and TERRY G. HILLARD, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
