Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Corwell v. Ennis et al
as 3:2026cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tara Elizabeth Corwell
Defendant:
Gail Ennis, Eliot D. Presott, Patrick J. Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bozeman v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv06522
Plaintiff:
Tara Bozeman
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Murphy v. City of Oak Creek et al
as 2:2026cv01152
Plaintiff:
Tara Murphy
Defendant:
City of Oak Creek and Toni Vanderboom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
In re Tara Marie Roberts
as 2:2026rd00057
Unknown:
Tara Marie Roberts
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mlacker v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2026cv00152
Plaintiff:
Tara Lynne Mlacker
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01516
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Logan et al v. Dawson et al
as 0:2026cv61771
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Logan and Tara Lynne Redmond
Defendant:
Dave Dawson, Newport Ventures Group, LLC, Sheryl McKanas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Worstell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00743
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Tara Worstell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
