Cases 41 - 50 of 1,023
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. Leonard et al
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Karl S. Leonard, Ted Knight, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hottenrott et al v. Iron, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tammy Moyer, Karen Hottenrott, Tammy Cairns and others
Defendant:
Iron, County of, Melanie Camps, Menominee, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Owens v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Mildred Deloris Owens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Mark Warshawsky, Stephen Evangelista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gibson et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gibson and Russell Schultz
Defendant:
City of Portland, Multnomah County, Multnomah County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burton Hill et al v. Wendt et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Chad Burton Hill and Louiza Bissette
Defendant:
David Wendt, Paul Burt, Ted Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamaal Bilal v. Jeffrey Benoit, et al
as 23-11703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BENOIT, JOHN HODGES, TED SHAW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
