Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Jones v. USA
as 1:2020cv02017
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones et al v. City of Indianola et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Officer John Winford, Officer John Antonie, Officer Danielle Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Jones, Tevin Jones and Terrance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08376
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Cedric Jones
as 19-51096
Defendant / Appellee:
CEDRIC TERRANCE JONES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01415
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JONES
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INC, IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Fun Zone Entertainment, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Fun Zone Entertainment, LLC, Allen Coleman, Ching Ping Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samad #265812 v. Foxx et al
as 2:2016cv00274
Plaintiff:
Ricky Samad #265812
Defendant:
Mario Foxx, Myron Foxx, Doug Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marcus Muhammad, et al v. Del Pearson
as 15-3044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS MUHAMMAD, TRACY JONES, TERRANCE JONES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEL PEARSON, Police Officer #16462
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04431
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe 1-10 and Police Officer Christopher Reiff
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
