Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butler v. Elsayed et al
as 2:2018cv00650
Plaintiff:
Terry Butler
Defendant:
Basem Elsayed and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Butler v. Jackson Police Department
as 3:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Terry Butler
Defendant:
Jackson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rosie Chatt, et al v. City of West Memphis, et al
as 11-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosie Chatt, Individually and as Co-Administrator in the Estate of Dewayne Chatt Sr., Deceased and Dewayne Chatt, Jr., Individually and as Co-Administrator in the Estate of Dewayne Chatt Sr., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
City of West Memphis, Arkansas, Samuel Malone, Individually & in Official Capacity as Officer of the West Memphis Police Department, Steven Jackson, Individually & in Official Capacity as Officer of the West Memphis Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chatt et al v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Rosie Chatt and Dewayne Chatt, Jr
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, Samuel Malone, Steven Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
