Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Graves v. Roanoke Virginia Social Security Board
as 7:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Graves
Defendant:
Roanoke Virginia Social Security Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Graves v. United States Government et al
as 7:2021cv00335
Defendant:
United States Government and Social Security Board
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2019cv02593
Defendant:
Prudential Financial, Lori Rykovich, Beth A. Bombara and others
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Board v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03165
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lee Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Board v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01622
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lee Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nagel v. Killroy et al
as 4:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Meriam Nagel
Defendant:
Michael Killroy and Members of the Judicial Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Commissioner Social Security Administration et al
as 8:2012cv02320
Plaintiff:
Robert Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Social Security Board Appeals Council Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Clocksin v. Commissioner of the Board of Prison Terms
as 1:2012at00486
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Clocksin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Coleman v. Disability Board Adjudication and Review
as 1:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Sharon Coleman
Defendant:
Disability Board Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dian Kishun v. Michael Astrue
as 10-1276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIAN C. KISHUN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security and LISA DE SOTO, Deputy Commissioner of Disability Adjudication and Review Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
