Cases 71 - 80 of 94
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Nancy D. Hogan, Bureau of Labor Statistics and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Vega
as 11-5016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Earl Grant
Defendant - Appellee:
Dixon Vega and City of Hartford
Prall v. Hartford Prosecutors et al
as 11-4135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant:
Hartford Prosecutors, Superior Court Judge, Department of Corrections and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James E. Thomas, Cathryn Krinitsky and Stephen J. Miele
Thomas v. Ortiz
as 11-3441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Troy Shamar Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
Nathaniel Ortiz, Detective, Hartford Police Department, Deborah Scates, Detective, Hartford Police Department, Franco Sanzo, Sergeant, Hartford Police Department and others
Francis v. Hartford Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv01344
Plaintiff:
Quince A. Francis, Jr.
Defendant:
Hartford Police Department, Robert Hathaway, John H. Marvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Vega et al
as 3:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Earl Grant
Defendant:
Dixon Vega and City of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartford Best v. Warden Bodison
as 11-6187
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARTFORD R. BEST
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN M. BODISON
Klemonski, Jr. v. Cournoyer
as 10-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin A. Klemonski, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Anne Cournoyer, Deputy Warden, WCCI, Sharon Thomas, (Jane Doe) Counselor Supv, WCCI, Brian, (John Doe) Mental Health Supv, WCCI and others
Best v. Bodison
as 2:2010cv01381
Petitioner:
Hartford R Best
Respondent:
McKither Bodison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
