Cases 1 - 10 of 24
State of New Mexico, ex rel. et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04187
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, EIDP Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, ex rel., Raul Torrez and New Mexico Environment Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: State of New Mexico
as 21-1121
Petitioner:
In re: STATE OF NEW MEXICO and NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office, ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
State of New Mexico, et al v. United States et al
as 2:2020cv02115
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Environment Department, Hector Balderas and State of New Mexico
Interested Party:
Tyco Fire Products LP and Chemguard Inc
Amicus Curiae:
Senator Antoinette Lopez, Representative Andres Romero and Senator Mimi Stewart
Defendant:
United States and United States Air Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Clervrain v. Hoover et al
as 3:2020cv00068
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, State of Hawaii Office of the Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
United States of America et al v. Pharmerica Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv02575
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp , Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Kindred Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Pharmerica Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv01312
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp. , Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
