Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Ingram v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
DeSean Ingram
Defendant:
U.S. Government, University Hospital, CDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Cassaday v. United States Government
as 22-1138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and U.S. GOVERNMENT
Locke v U.S. Government et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Locke
Defendant:
Attorney 1, Attorney 2, U.S. Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cutburth v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dr Ronald W Cutburth
Defendant:
U.S. Government and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Reece et al
as 2:2020cv12057
Defendant:
Daniel Reece, Gene L Dodario and GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office
Plaintiff:
Alina Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. Stovall et al
as 6:2019cv00206
Respondent:
Rachel Johnson, Ns. Parsons-Gould, Tara Cimarossa and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
LeBlanc v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2019cv00508
Defendant:
Kalamazoo, City of, Social Security Administration, U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Roland LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2019cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lynn Cooper and Ashlynn Isabella Haynes
Defendant:
Putnam County, U.S. Government, Rutherford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Government
as 19-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE, Daniel Castleberry
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
