Cases 1 - 10 of 4,879
Moore v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Calvin Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Bran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Bran
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Diego v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Donnell Dwayne Diego
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gary Hancock, Jr. v. US
as 24-6368
Plaintiff:
GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
