Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
VENEY et al v. PHO FLORIDA & GRILL, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv62167
Defendant:
PHO FLORIDA & GRILL, LLC and Tho Tran
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN CAMPBELL and ERIC VENEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Tran v. Wofford
as 1:2013cv02012
Petitioner:
Tho Tran
Respondent:
Wofford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
State of Louisiana v. American Natl Prop & Cslty Co., et al
as 13-90167
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of insured(s)/ assignor(s)/ subrogor(s) Tho Tran and Chuc Tran
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, AMERICAN NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and ANPAC LOUISIANA INSURANCE COMPANY
Wattleton, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 10-1866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Plaintiff:
KEDRICK F. O'MEARA, JOSEPH SANTULLI, MERVIN WATAHOMIGIE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services, US PROBATION and US BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hardcastle et al v. Daschle
as 4:2009cv40014
Plaintiff:
James Hardcastle, Kedrick F. O'Meara, Joseph Santulli and others
Defendant:
Tom Daschle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardcastle et al
as 1:2009cv10109
Plaintiff:
James Hardcastle, Kedrick F. O'Meara, Joseph Santulli and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Tho Tran
as 08-8559
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant:
THO TRAN
Tran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2007hc02059
Petitioner:
Tho Tran
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
