Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sack v. Summit County et al
as 1:2026cv04291
Plaintiff:
Guy R. Sack
Defendant:
Summit County, Colorado, Town of Frisco, Colorado, Summit Fire & EMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danery Antonio Abrante Calvo v. Anthony Thomas Davis et al
as 2:2026cv02450
Defendant:
Anthony Thomas Davis and Danery Antonio Abrante Calvo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Webb v. Garcia et al
as 1:2026cv05222
Plaintiff:
Derek K Webb
Defendant:
Jose Garcia, Thomas Davis, Christopher Yumas and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2026hc02071
Petitioner:
Thomas Davis Ingram, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00014
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2025cv02041
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv10861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-13548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-13190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv12035
Plaintiff:
Ladonna J. Williams, Clarence Williams Jr., Nathaniel Whitfield and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cross-Defendant:
Jason Christopher Bigart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
