Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MACIAS v. SHARP et al
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
SHARP, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and GREENSBORO FEDERAL COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Macias v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00856
Plaintiff:
Thomas Macias, III
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Macias v. Federal Aviation Admin
as 13-2047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
MACIAS v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Macias v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Thomas Macias
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
MACIAS v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2012cv00944
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
MACIAS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54925
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MACIAS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36305
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MACIAS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MACIAS v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MACIAS V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv34730
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
