Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-3628
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Santorelli v. Town Of Islip et al
as 1:2018cv01078
Defendant:
Jason Mistretta, Tracey Krut, Thomas Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Santorelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Custard v. Cedeno et al
as 1:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
Bob Allen Custard
Defendant:
Davis, Sara Dunn, Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Thomas Owens, et al
as 15-2652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS OWENS, Detective, Johnstown Police Department, Individually and in his Official Capacity, BETH MCCONNELL, Caseworker, Childern and Youth Services, Individually and in her official Capacity, TINA HIPPLER, Caseworker for Childern and Youth Services, in her individual and official capacity and others
Nichols v. Owens et al
as 2:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
Claus Nichols
Defendant:
Thomas Owens , Michael Stewart and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
RAY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS OWENS, BETH MCCONNELL, TINA HIPPLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Superintendent
as 1:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Thomas Owens
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owens v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2014cv10830
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Thomas Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LAMB et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05825
Plaintiff:
EVA LAMB , PATRICIA LAMBERT , JAMES A. LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION , SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOSEPH A. NICHOLS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
