Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Parsons v. Montgomery
as 23-254
Petitioner:
JASON THOMAS PARSONS
Respondent:
WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, WARDEN
Parsons v. Six Appellate District California Court of Appeal et al
as 5:2022cv09049
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
Six Appellate District California Court of Appeal, Mark D. Greenberg and Patricia Bamattre-Manoukian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Cantil-Sakauye
as 5:2022cv04882
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parsons v. San Jose Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04691
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
San Jose Police Department, Santa Clara County, William Todd Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00889
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southern Counties Oil Company v. Henry et al
as 2:2018cv02307
Plaintiff:
Southern Counties Oil Company
Defendant:
Christopher Reinesch, Lucas Henry and Thomas Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parsons et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02980
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parsons and Paula Parsons
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06430
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Parsons and Thomas Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parsons v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
