Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Hodges v. Henrico Police Department, et al.
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael Prince Hodges
Defendant:
Bradley Randall Hill, Alan Thomas Richardson and Henrico Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Richardson et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Richardson and Marguerite Richardson
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Thomas Richardson
as 22-3196
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS RICHARDSON
James Aursby v. Kyle Richardson
as 22-7103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. AURSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE THOMAS RICHARDSON, IRENE PAYNE HYRE, HIRAM MACPHERSON and others
Richardson v. NV5, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02454
Plaintiff:
Thomas Richardson
Defendant:
NV5, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 - FLSA -- Minimum Wage
Zullo et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Adam Zullo, David Perez, Thomas Barretti and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zullo et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc.
as 2:2021cv06253
Plaintiff:
Adam Zullo, David Perez, Thomas Barretti and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Zullo et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06253
Plaintiff:
Adam Zullo, David Perez, Thomas Barretti and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Richardson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04952
Plaintiff:
Helen Richardson and Thomas Richardson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
