Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thurman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01963
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Thurman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin French v. Paul Harris, et al
as 20-5663
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL HARRIS, et al, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, BENJAMIN MANUEL RUSS, Post Conviction Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN L. FRENCH
Hasbrouck et al v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08112
Defendant:
David Williams, Carlton Woodruff, Larry Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Donna M Hasbrouck and Earl M Hasbrouck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THURMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80931
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THURMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36496
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS THURMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thurman et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv28952
Plaintiff:
Norma Thurman and Thomas Thurman
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darnell v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Darnell
Defendant:
Google, Inc., Bandwith, Inc., Nuestar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crater et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2012cv08190
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Crater and Brenda Lynn Crater
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Kent Cattini, Arthur Markham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THURMAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40475
Plaintiff:
THOMAS THURMAN and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
