Cases 1 - 10 of 1,543
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Power Contracting, LLC v. Thurman
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Power Contracting, LLC
Defendant:
David Thurman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
THURMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv02765
Plaintiff:
CINDY THURMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Adams, et al
as 24-4026
Petitioner:
LARRY ADAMS, JED R. CHRISTENSEN, KIRK R. HARRISON and others
Respondent:
ROY NIELSEN HAFEN and WILLIAM T. THURMAN
Tullier et al v. Ace American Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Onieta Tullier and David Tullier
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Robert Thurman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carlos Thurman v. Cookie Crews, et al
as 24-5166
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. THURMAN
Defendant:
COOKIE CREWS, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, RANDY L. WHITE, Deputy Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, ALLYSON LAMBERT, Department of Corrections Ombudsman and others
Carlos Thurman v. Cookie Crews, et al
as 24-5154
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. THURMAN
Defendant:
COOKIE CREWS, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, RANDY L. WHITE, Deputy Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, ALLYSON LAMBERT, Department of Corrections Ombudsman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Thurman
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Smith
Defendant:
Ronald Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
