Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Patricia McColm v. State of California, et al
as 20-16817
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, TIM NEAL, A. GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA A. MCCOLM
Powers v. Brad Cole, et al
as 6:2019cv03437
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edward Powers
Defendant:
Phillip Weathers, Brad Cole, Deputy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
(PC) Case v. Fisher et al
as 1:2019cv01739
Defendant:
Dr. Harminder Singh Longia, Sara L Smith, Patricia Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. OBAMA, et al
as 2:2016cv01149
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH JONES
Trustee:
BARACK OBAMA, JACOB LEW, DAVID B. WADSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Jones v. Wayne County Court of Common Pleas Clerk of Courts et al
as 5:2015cv01858
Plaintiff:
Jason Keith Jones
Defendant:
Wayne County Court of Common Pleas Clerk of Courts and Tim Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McColm v. State of California et al
as 1:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. McColm
Defendant:
State of California, Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Correctional Women's Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parthemore v. Toor et.al.
as 1:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Ira D. Parthemore
Defendant:
Kiran Deep Singh Toor, Nagabhushana Siddappa Malakkla, Paul Singh Virk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parthemore v. Toor et.al.
as 4:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ira D. Parthemore
Defendant:
Kiran Deep Singh Toor, Nagabhushana Siddappa Malakkla, Paul Singh Virk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv01805
Plaintiff:
Harold Jenkins
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Tim Neal, Coryn Pierini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv01413
Plaintiff:
Randy Cook
Defendant:
Ron Davis and Tim Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
