Cases 1 - 10 of 604
Timm v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
John E Timm
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Arely Buendia Perez
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Richard Timmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeAnda et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv10798
Plaintiff:
Laney DeAnda, Amber Timms and Kayla Heidger
Defendant:
James Deon Lee, Tropical Touch Spas, LLC, Southgate Reiki, LLC d/b/a Tropical Touch Southgate and others
Timm v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00499
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald Timm
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timms v. Mega Motors Inc
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Caleb Jones Timms
Defendant:
Mega Motors Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timm v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
Gary Timm, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. LCRF/GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
LCRF/GOE, Timms LNU and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
