Cases 11 - 20 of 203
US v. Antonio Woods
as 23-6766
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO R. WOODS, a/k/a Toby
ALLEN v. MILLS et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
JESSICA-HILES ALLEN
Defendant:
JOHN A. MILLS, DERRICK TOBY, MICHELE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Toby McDuffie, Jr. v. Wade
as 23-6411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY M. MCDUFFIE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. WADE, CHENEQUA MCNEILL and CAPTAIN THOMPSON
Stewart v. Dotson et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Royale L. Stewart
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Samuel Boone, Jr., Michelle Dermyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abney et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
James D. Abney, Benjamin Acuna, Gonzalo Erick Aguilar-Vargas and others
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Colette S. Peters and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act - Disposition by Agency Req
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kennelly et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kennelly, Chad Koenig, Ross Loblein and others
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tompkins et al v. US Radiology Specialists Inc.
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Tompkins, Kenneth Brennan, Toby Libby and others
Defendant:
US Radiology Specialists Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moore v. Stirling
as 1:2022cv02202
Petitioner:
Toby E. Moore and Toby Eugene Moore
Respondent:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hixon v. King et al
as 8:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Bret Kyle Hixon
Defendant:
Daniel King, Karen Roper, Shannon Ellenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
