Cases 11 - 20 of 589
Vickery et al v. McBride et al
as 8:2023cv05647
Plaintiff:
Russell Vickery, Matthew Richey, Charles Williams and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad McBride, Captain David Baker, Admin. Lt. Nathan Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Rutkowski et al
as 3:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ira Alston
Defendant:
Toby Rutkowski, Maurillo R. Amorim, Seth Laprey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Scioto County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Toby Hall
Defendant:
Scioto County Jail and John Aeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Antonio Woods
as 23-6763
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO R. WOODS, a/k/a Toby
JONES v. GANSKY et al
as 2:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
MACK JONES
Defendant:
JOSEPH GANSKY, JOSEPH GEORGE, MATTHEW TOBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Gail P. Hardy, Mathew C. Gedansky, James R. Turcotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
