Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Barr v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
Todd William Barr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 22-20217
Petitioner / Appellant:
Victor Todd Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Williams v. United States of America
as 22-885
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Todd Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Williams v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 1:2021cv00423
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Richard Todd Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv00770
Petitioner:
Victor Todd Williams
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01554
Plaintiff:
John Todd Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baron-St.Laurent et al v. Arizona Department of Human Services et al
as 2:2019cv05443
Plaintiff:
Todd Williams, Edward Brown, Ronald Rene Baron-St.Laurent and others
Defendant:
Pascal Koulemou, Unknown Bugby, Arizona Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Marshall County Jail
as 3:2019cv00612
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Williams
Defendant:
Marshall County Jail, Bo Holcomb, Quality Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Strangfeld et al
as 1:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Mikeal Robert William Pears, Todd Williams, Dina Micheall Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dean Cassada Willingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARCHESE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2018cv01318
Plaintiff:
CHERYL LOUISE MARCHESE
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA SHERIFFS OFFICE, MICHAEL TODD WILLIAMS and MCKELMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
