Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hamilton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00087
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hamilton, Angie Hamilton, Ricky Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLAYTON v. WARD et al
as 1:2021cv00025
Defendant:
SGT TONY WARD, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, HEAD WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and others
Plaintiff:
LANTARIO LATRAVIAN CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv08239
Plaintiff:
Tony Ward
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adrat et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11516
Plaintiff:
Anne-Marie Morrison, Barbara LaBarca, John Woodley and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Williams v. Ward
as 6:2018cv01138
Plaintiff:
Michael L Williams
Defendant:
Tony Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt, et al v. Equity Group Eufaula Division, LLC
as 2:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Christopher Merritt , Jerry Blakely , James Stewart and others
Defendant:
Equity Group Eufaula Division, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ward v. USA
as 4:2011cv00066
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tony Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sutton, et al v. KY Hopkins County, et al
as 4:2003cv00003
Defendant:
Hopkins County, Kentucky and Jim Lantrip
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Sutton , Lester H. Turner , Linda Joyce Ford and others
Movant:
Kentucky Association of Counties and Bobby A. Eversole
Claimant:
Jhonni Upton and Misti Titus
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Chyrle Ava Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
